The 109th Congress can and should:
- reduce the budget for national defense from the current sum of about
$300 billion to $185 billion (in fiscal year 2002 dollars)—in
increments over five years;
- make it clear that the reduced budget must be accompanied by a more
restrained national military posture that requires enough forces to
fight one major theater war instead of the current posture based on
the need to wage two nearly simultaneous wars;
- restructure U.S. forces to reflect the American geostrategic
advantage of virtual invulnerability to invasion by deeply cutting
ground forces (Army and Marines) while retaining a larger percentage
of the Navy and Air Force;
- authorize a force structure of 5 active-duty Army divisions (down
from 10 now), 1 active Marine division (reduced from 3 now), 14 Air
Force fighter wings (down from 20 now), 200 Navy ships (down from
316), and 6 carrier battle groups with 6 Navy air wings (reduced from
12 and 11, respectively);
- require that the armed services compensate for reduced active forces
by relying more on the National Guard and the reserves in any major
conflict;
- terminate weapons systems that are unneeded or are relics of the
Cold War and use the savings to give taxpayers a break and to beef up
neglected mission areas;
- terminate all peacekeeping and overseas presence missions so that
the armed services can concentrate on training to fight wars and to
deploy from the U.S. homeland in an expeditionary mode should that
become necessary; and
- require negotiations with Russia to mutually reduce strategic
nuclear warheads below START II levels—to about 1,500 war-heads
each.
- reduce tax expenditures by privatization through letters
of Marque and Reprisal
- promptly eliminate the foreign aid budget devoted to developmental
aid,
- withdraw all U.S. military personnel from Bosnia and Kosovo within
one year,
- withdraw all U.S. troops stationed in Western Europe by 2005,
- withdraw all U.S. troops stationed in South Korea by 2005,
- withdraw all U.S. troops stationed in Japan by 2007,
- transfer some of the funding and personnel involved in the above
withdrawals to units and tasks relevant to the war on terrorism, and
- demobilize all surplus forces.
Defense Budget Tutorial #1: What is the actual size of the 2006 defense budget?
Links from Americans Against Bombing:
We will not even begin to see substantive cuts in a bloated military
budget unless we begin a national debate on the subject of "National
Security: Who Ensures It?"
next: Terrorism |
I appreciate your comments
Do you disagree with me?
I will thoughtfully, prayerfully, respectfully and
personally respond to your criticisms
email: comments@KevinCraig.US |
|