Allison, Batte, and Peters'
Separation Home Page



Who are we, and why did we create this home page?

The phrase originates in Thomas Jefferson's 1802 letter to the Baptist Association of Danbury,

We consider and refute three other charges against Jefferson's wall metaphor elsewhere in this web page. If you want to read these sections now, click here,
here,
and here.

Indeed, this is exactly what Thomas Jefferson, one of the greatest American defenders of religious liberty, believed.

the religious right have talked openly of getting rid of separation. Their spoken and written comments on the subject leave no doubt where they stand


An overview of the debate.

As we document elsewhere, the assumption of the framers of the Constitution was that the federal government could exercise only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution.

This issue is the focus of our discussion in the sections of our web page entitled federalism and absence of delegated powers.

A second issue is whether the First Amendment can itself be interpreted as a grant of power to the federal government. We discuss this issue in our section of this web page devoted to the grammar of the establishment clause.

The classic statement of this position is Justice Black's majority opinion in Everson v. Board of Education. These issues are discussed throughout our section of the web page devoted to the case for separation.

Some other controversies concern the interpretation of the word "establishment" in the First Amendment, what the framers meant by "respecting" establishment, and why the framers modified the word establishment with the word "an." We take on all these issues in our section on the grammar of the establishment clause.

  1. Separationists
    A classic summary of the broad interpretation is given in Everson v. Board of Education.
  2. Accomodationists.
  3. Non-preferentialists.

The case for separation of church and state.

     Grammatical arguments in favor of a broad reading of the establishment clause
     Responses to grammatical arguments in favor of a narrow reading.

a popular non-preferentialist interpretation

Malbin on the history of the religion clauses,

and his discussion of Article III of the Northwest Ordinance


What the Founders believed about separation.

  1. James Madison
  2. James Wilson
  3. Rufus King
  4. Elbridge Gerry
  5. Edmund Randolph
  6. Charles Pinckney
  7. George Mason
  8. Alexander Hamilton
  9. Gouverneur Morris
  10. John Rutledge
  11. Caleb Strong
  12. George Read
  13. John Marshall
  14. John Vining
  15. Ben Franklin
  16. Fisher Ames
  17. James Monroe
  18. James McHenry
  19. Thomas Jefferson
  20. Samuel Adams
  21. Patrick Henry
  22. John Q. Adams
  23. John Adams
  24. Oliver Ellsworth
  25. Ben Rush
  26. John Jay
  27. John Randolph
  28. Joseph Story
  29. Henry Lee
  30. John Hancock
  31. John Witherspoon
  32. Noah Webster

Answering the religious right.

  1. The phrase "separation of church and state" is not in the Constitution.
  2. Jefferson's "separation of church and state" letter was hastily written and does not accurately represent Jefferson's view of church and state.

         For the full text of Jefferson's letter to Lincoln, click here.
         For the full text of Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists, click here.

  3. Thomas Jefferson actually said that the wall of separation between Church and State is "one-directional."

         For a more complete explanation of Jefferson's beliefs, look here.

  4. Jefferson's Danbury letter was written mearly to assure Connecticut Baptists that the Constitution did not permit the establishment of a national denomination.

         the significance of Jefferson's Danbury letter
         a copy of the Danbury Baptist's letter to Jefferson survives
         This view, over course, is absurd, and we refute it here.

  5. Jefferson's Danbury letter was written mearly to address the Danbury Baptists' fears that the First Amendment might be misinterpreted.
       Barton's 1996 account of the Baptists' letter
        (his other attempts are examined here
        and here).
  6. Jefferson's letter to Benjamin Rush shows that Jefferson was a non-preferentialist.
  7. Thomas Jefferson supported Bible reading in school; this is proven by his service as the first president of the Washington D. C. public schools, which used the Bible and Watt's Hymns as textbooks for reading.
         Leonard Levy's book Jefferson and Civil Liberties: The Darker Side
  8. Federal officials take their oaths upon a Bible, and use the words "so help me God."
  9. The Northwest Ordinance proves that the First Amendment did not separate church and state.
         First examine the history of the first sentence of Article III of the Northwest Ordinance.
        The Northwest Ordinance:
  10. The Supreme Court has declared that the United States is a Christian nation.
  11. Depictions of Moses and the 10 Commandments are featured prominently in the Supreme Court Building; this proves that the founders had no intention of separating Church and State.
         (click here for a more detailed discussion of the subordinate placement of Moses and the 10 Commandments in the architectural fabric of the Supreme Court building).
         the Supreme Court building committee deferred to the architects in their choice of artistic embellishment
         click here for a look for our critique of one popular accommodationist commentary on the art of the Supreme Court).
  12. The Constitution is based on the Bible. This is proven by the frequency with which the founding fathers quote the Bible in their political writings.
  13. Montesquieu based his theory of separation of powers on Isaiah 33:22 and Jeremiah 17:9.
  14. As a general matter, the Constitution embodies the principles of Christianity and the 10 Commandments.

Misquoting by the religious right.

An alleged case of misquoting by Separationists:

Does the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli say that "The Government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion?" 


Important Establishment Clause cases.

Standards for adjudicating establishment clause cases:

Interpretive issues:

The establishment clause and education:



The Historical Evidence

The Founding Period: 1774-1789

The Post-Founding Period: 1790-1861

Post-Civil War attempts to incorporate religious language into the Constitution -- 1863 - 1910

Important separationist documents.

Historial separationist documents:


Historical Documents

State Constitutions

The sections dealing with religion of the state constitutions have been excerpted on the following pages:


The Legal Heritage

Important Establishment Clause Cases decided by the U. S. Supreme Court

Evolution of the Principle

The case against government-sponsored prayer.

Why school prayer is already legal, and why a school prayer amendment is unneeded, unworkable, and harmful to our civil liberties.

[School prayer is not legal; individual prayer in schools might possibly. The Founders believed in school prayer and national prayer, not just individual prayer.

Government Sponsored Prayer

The case against school vouchers.

Why school vouchers are unconstitutional, and why they pose a grave threat to American education.

Direct Aid: Vouchers


Recent documents on religious liberty:

 

Some timely articles.

Patricia King has written a powerful article on legal discrimination still faced by non-believers in America. It's an interesting counterpoint to the claims of the religious right that non-belief is ascendent in the public square.

Have you ever wondered what can happen when a member of the religious right assumes a position of judicial authority? Deborah Arias found out firsthand when her New York divorce and custody case was assigned to a judge sympathetic to the religious right. Read about it in a essay I've entitled "A close encounter with the religious right."

Is Halloween an attempt to instill satanism in the schools? That's what some people in the religious right want you to believe. This article by W. J. Bethancourt looks at the content of some religious right literature on Halloween and exposes its historical and logical fallacies.

Charles Levendosky is an editorial writer for the Casper Wyoming Star-Tribune. This editorial is a scathing indictment of the religious equality amendment now circulating in Congress (he's promised to send us more on religious liberty themes when he writes about them).

 


 

Some links of importance


Links