Who are we, and why did we create this home page?
The phrase originates in Thomas Jefferson's 1802 letter to the Baptist Association of Danbury,
We consider and refute three other charges against Jefferson's wall metaphor elsewhere in this web page. If you want to read these sections now, click here,
here,
and here.
Indeed, this is exactly what Thomas Jefferson, one of the greatest American defenders of religious liberty, believed.
the religious right have talked openly of getting rid of separation. Their spoken and written comments on the subject leave no doubt where they stand
As we document elsewhere, the assumption of the framers of the Constitution was that the federal government could exercise only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution.
This issue is the focus of our discussion in the sections of our web page entitled federalism and absence of delegated powers.
A second issue is whether the First Amendment can itself be interpreted as a grant of power to the federal government. We discuss this issue in our section of this web page devoted to the grammar of the establishment clause.
The classic statement of this position is Justice Black's majority opinion in Everson v. Board of Education. These issues are discussed throughout our section of the web page devoted to the case for separation.
Some other controversies concern the interpretation of the word "establishment" in the First Amendment, what the framers meant by "respecting" establishment, and why the framers modified the word establishment with the word "an." We take on all these issues in our section on the grammar of the establishment clause.
- Separationists
A classic summary of the broad interpretation is given in Everson v. Board of Education.- Accomodationists.
- Non-preferentialists.
The case for separation of church and state.
Federalism
and state establishments
multiple religious
establishments,
Absence of delegated power
the worries of the anti-federalists
Thomas
Tucker
Grammatical arguments in favor of a broad reading of the establishment clause
Responses to grammatical arguments in favor of a narrow reading.a popular non-preferentialist interpretation
Malbin on the history of the religion clauses,
and his discussion of Article III of the Northwest Ordinance
What the Founders believed about separation.
- James Madison
- James Wilson
- Rufus King
- Elbridge Gerry
- Edmund Randolph
- Charles Pinckney
- George Mason
- Alexander Hamilton
- Gouverneur Morris
- John Rutledge
- Caleb Strong
- George Read
- John Marshall
- John Vining
- Ben Franklin
- Fisher Ames
- James Monroe
- James McHenry
- Thomas Jefferson
- Samuel Adams
- Patrick Henry
- John Q. Adams
- John Adams
- Oliver Ellsworth
- Ben Rush
- John Jay
- John Randolph
- Joseph Story
- Henry Lee
- John Hancock
- John Witherspoon
- Noah Webster
- Isaac Backus
- John Leland
- Roger Williams
Answering the religious right.
For the full text of Jefferson's letter to Lincoln, click here.
For the full text of Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists,
click here.
For a more complete explanation of Jefferson's beliefs, look here.
the significance of Jefferson's
Danbury letter
a copy of the Danbury Baptist's letter to
Jefferson survives
This view, over course, is absurd, and we refute it here.
- Does the Constitution embody Christian thought and morality?
- The "Sundays excepted" clause and the Sabbath.
- "The Year of our Lord" and separation.
Misquoting by the religious right.
An alleged case of misquoting by Separationists:
Does the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli say that "The Government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion?"
Important Establishment Clause cases.
Standards for adjudicating establishment clause cases:
Interpretive issues:
The establishment clause and education:
Important separationist documents. Historial separationist documents:
|
Historical Documents
|
The sections dealing with religion of the state constitutions have been excerpted on the following pages:
Case Excerpts from The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation: Annotations of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States as prepared by the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress
The
case against government-sponsored prayer.
Why school prayer is already legal, and why a school prayer amendment is unneeded, unworkable, and harmful to our civil liberties. [School prayer is not legal; individual prayer in schools might possibly. The Founders believed in school prayer and national prayer, not just individual prayer. |
Government Sponsored Prayer
|
The
case against school vouchers.
Why school vouchers are unconstitutional, and why they pose a grave threat to American education. |
Direct Aid: Vouchers
|
Recent documents on religious
liberty:
Patricia King has written a powerful article on legal discrimination still faced by non-believers in America. It's an interesting counterpoint to the claims of the religious right that non-belief is ascendent in the public square. Have you ever wondered what can happen when a member of the religious right assumes a position of judicial authority? Deborah Arias found out firsthand when her New York divorce and custody case was assigned to a judge sympathetic to the religious right. Read about it in a essay I've entitled "A close encounter with the religious right." Is Halloween an attempt to instill satanism in the schools? That's what some people in the religious right want you to believe. This article by W. J. Bethancourt looks at the content of some religious right literature on Halloween and exposes its historical and logical fallacies. Charles Levendosky is an editorial writer for the Casper Wyoming Star-Tribune. This editorial is a scathing indictment of the religious equality amendment now circulating in Congress (he's promised to send us more on religious liberty themes when he writes about them).
|
|
Links
|