|
This passage (John 8) is frequently misunderstood. The command in Scripture is against one participating in an execution if he himself was complicit in that same crime. God's Law never required absolute sinlessness on the part of the people before they could execute a rapist or murderer. Only that they not be a part of that same crime.
In John 8, the religious leaders of Jesus' day -- who Jesus says were the most evil people in history (Matthew 23:35) -- brought an adulteress before Jesus. These men claimed to be the great "defenders" of God's Law, and they claim to be so very concerned about the details of the law, and outraged that they caught a woman in the very act of adultery, so they bring the woman before Jesus to see if Jesus is as passionate a defender of the Law as they are.
The Law of God commanded that BOTH the man and the woman be punished (Leviticus 20:10). Yet the man is not there. WITH WHOM was the woman caught in adultery -- "in the very act?" Why is the other party not here as well?
We can tell already that this whole thing is a fraud and a set-up.
Jesus frequently accused the religious leaders of being "adulterous" (e.g., Mark 8:38), and as they one-by-one slithered away like snakes, leaving only the woman, it became clear that these men were probably the ones who committed adultery with her. Thus the woman could not be stoned under Old Testament law, because there were no qualified witnesses to testify against her (an absolute requirement under the law) (Deut 17:7).
Thus the woman could not have been convicted of the crime of adultery under Old Testament law, so it is no wonder that Jesus did not advocate her stoning. Jesus kept the OT law perfectly.